We all know it as "Bantu Education" and the reason for the "Soweto Uprising" where an estimated 20 000 black students protested against Afrikaans being a medium of instruction. The split was to be 50-50 (Afrikaans & English) and the rest of the subjects in the students native language. The subjects that were chosen for Afrikaans from Standard five (grade 7) were, mathematics, arithmetic and social studies. The Subjects chosen for English were, general science and practical subjects (homecraft, needlework, woodwork, metalwork, art, agricultural science) and their Native languages would be used for religion instruction, music, and physical culture.
So, Afrikaans had 3 Subjects, English about 7 Subjects and Native also 3 Subjects. Let me just add that the black students held banners with the slogan "DOWN WITH BAAS EDUCATION", baas meaning Boss in Afrikaans. So it is very clear that they had no problem with English being used, but had a problem with the Afrikaner / Boer language being used. In other words, they had no problem picking an Oppressive Language (The English being to most oppressive Empire in recent history) above an African Language (Afrikaans being "born" in Africa from German, French and Dutch languages). African = Afrika.
Then you also have to understand that Black African languages are very limited in terms of terminology. They had no formal written down language and it was simply transferred verbally, from generation to generation, thus they did not develop more words as time went on. This ensured a huge obstacle of the Apartheid Gov as they could not educate black students in Maths, Science, Woodwork, Social Studies, agricultural sciences etc if the black languages did not have the terminology to be used. How on earth will you educate someone in Maths, if that person's culture did not even invent such forms of education and his / her language does not have any Mathematical terminology?? So, the language issue was actually caused by their own Culture / Language's Limitations
That was one reason for the protest, another being that they were supposedly taught in "second and third rate" education levels meaning that according to them, they were taught according to a less important standard. Now bare in mind, these were people who had no formal education institutions and / or systems in place, ever. So, the previous Gov were left with two obstacles thus far, one being language and the other being the "history of their education standards". So yes, the previous Gov introduced a standard of education that was not the same as that of White Schools, and the main reason for that was, that even thought they were getting an education that was "sub / below standard", that they still struggled to move from one standard to another, often being 18 years old while being in standard 6 (grade 8). This again is due to their lack of development of both culture and language being limited. You cannot expect for a culture, that has never had any form of formal education system, to suddenly be on par with that of a culture that invented this education system. Again, it was their own limitation that caused this gap. Also, ever since 94, education standards had to be lowered to accommodate the black pupils as they were suddenly on the receiving end of the same standard that Whites were subject to, and failing. Some schools have even reported a zero pass rate for matriculants in past years. So, what did they fight for as it is clear that they could not cope with the high standards of White Education after 94 and didn't want the "sub" standard Bantu Education? Either way, the Standards were dropped so low after 94, I would imagine them to be either the same or lower than that of the Bantu Education System. Again, THEIR OWN DOING.
Look at the table above of 1983. Look at the number of Black students that enrolled in grade 1 (Sub A). There were more than 1 million students. Now look at how their numbers drop the further they went "up" in the education system. It can be clearly seen that they wanted education with the 1 million in grade 1, but that their limitation caused their numbers to drop to 72 000 in Standard 10. This again, not due to Apartheid, but due to "limitation" within their cultures, their languages, their development, their ability and their willingness to learn. The older they got, the less interested they were in educating themselves and the more they became interested in violence, crime, murder, theft and rape.
This is the "mentality" that we have to live and work with every day!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu_Education_Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soweto_uprising
http://africanhistory.about.com/od/apartheid/ss/ApartheidSkool1.htm
F V de Wet
_____________________________________________________
By Mike Smith
11th of May 2010
If Communists value and care so much about education, why do they kill off the educated elite as the first thing they do in taking over a country?
From Stalin’s purges to Mao’s “Great leap forward”, From Cuba to Cambodia...the first thing the Communists do when they take over is to kill the academics and educated elite...IN THEIR MILLIONS. In Cambodia they killed about 2 million alone. People were killed for simply wearing glasses, because if you could read, you were already too clever.
That alone should convince anyone that communists have never and will never give a toss about education. In fact the worst enemy of the communist is the educated person. The entire system of communism is depended on a dumbed down, uneducated and unemployed proletariat (the sheep).
Today the Bantu-Education Act of 1953 is highly criticized, called “racist” and “discriminatory”.
I wonder how many of those critics have ever read it through, because I have and I still challenge anyone to point me to the discriminatory part.
Yet it is today held up as one of the main reasons for the resistance against Apartheid as well as the violence of the student’s uprisings of 1976.
Its critics are the usual gang of liberals, culture relativists, humanists and racial egalitarians, but their criticism holds no water.
If one scrutinises the Act as posted above, one will see that the act established a black education department, basically gives the minister of education along with the minister of finance the right to fund the black government schools in a way they deem appropriate, that the government holds the right to determine the medium of instruction and that the minister of education can consult and establish black school councils on how to run the schools and what to teach.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. As I said in part Seven of this series, the duty of the government was not and is not and will never be to provide schools (or any other infrastructure) to anybody. The role of the government is to protect the citizens against the initiation of force. That is it! For the rest of the part, they should keep their nose out of the business of the people.
Government schools are actually a form of initiating force. It steals our money, it locks our children up with criminals, gangsters and drug dealers every day, it teaches them socialist doctrines, dumb them down incapable of rational or logical thought, and it falsifies our history. ..But people like schools, because they think schools do good. Nevertheless the NP government taxed whites almost to death to provide schools for blacks. During Apartheid schooling was made compulsory for all children up to 16 years of age...
But apart from the actual Bantu Education Act of 1953, that nobody ever reads, and just believe what they find in Wikipedia about Apartheid Education...How did it actually work?
As I have pointed out during this series, whites and blacks have huge cultural differences between them. Whites and blacks have huge religious and language differences between them.
Would it not be fair that blacks be instructed in a way that is more suited towards their cultural and religious needs? If one takes the road of the racial egalitarian and culture relativist, one would destroy the culture of the blacks, destroy their language and religion.
Cultural Relativism destroys all cultures. Racial egalitarianism destroys all races, humanism destroys all religions.
Remember that the previous government was called the “National Party” not, “The National Socialist Party”. It did not believe in the destruction of other cultures and people, it believed in the peaceful co-existence between diverse groups, their preservation and separate, but equal development.
And that is all Bantu Education was. It acknowledged the cultural and religious differences of whites and blacks and seeked to educate both groups along those cultural lines.
Surely it would be wrong to force the stories of Snow White and Goldilocks down the throats of black children. How do they relate to Repunsel with here long hair when blacks have peppercorns or afros?
It would be far better if they learned their own songs, their own culture and their own stories of how the zebra got its stripes when God did not intend for black and white to even exist.
The same with white children. It would be far better to teach them about their own poems, songs and books. Blacks and whites have different heroes, different values, different everything.
Blacks needs to be educated in a different way than whites. Blacks have a natural, affinity to music, dance and colourful art. Should one have destroyed that and forced them subjects that they do not like, do not understand or should one have taken their natural talents and improve on it?
When someone says that the Bantu Education system was inferior to that of the whites, then that person either admits that black culture is inferior or that whites are superior. They will then have to explain what they mean by inferior. Inferior to what? Relative to what?...Maybe High Western civilised education? If they say that educating blacks along black cultural lines is inferior to educating whites along white cultural lines then I have to ask you...Who are the real racists here...liberals or Nationalists?
There were thousands of blacks during the time of the National Party who made it to university and for those provisions of tertiary education of world standard was provided. Ten black universities in SA and the homelands in total.
Today one just has to look around to see how many medical doctors, nurses, lawyers and judges there are in South Africa who got their education under this exact “Bantu Education” system of the National Party. It was not inferior at all. If one accuses any of these graduates of having a substandard degree or education, one would be insulting such a person.
One has to remember that blacks In South Africa had no schools, no written language no basic arithmetic, nothing... prior to the white man came to Africa and through their missionaries started educating blacks.
African societies placed strong emphasis on traditional forms of education well before the arrival of Europeans. Education involved oral histories of the group, tales of heroism and treachery, and practice in the skills necessary for survival in a changing bush environment.
The European styled English and Afrikaans/Dutch curriculum placed no value on such skills. It would have been morally wrong to force such a European system on the blacks of South Africa.
Today there are many who wants to quote and say that the NP wanted to purposefully keep blacks stupidand who selectively quotes what suits them , but when one look deeper and see the truth behind the bullshit and the proof of the pudding then the picture is rather different.
In an article called “Die Afrikaner” 11 Feb 1987, the quarterly magazine called “Vox Africana Nr 29 4/87 stated that,
South Africa had 4,8 million whites and 18,2 million blacks in 1987. The whites paid 77% of the taxes and the blacks only 15%...despite this...56% of the government budget was spent on blacks.
Today it is often quoted that, “Per-capita government spending on black education slipped to one-tenth of spending on whites in the 1970s”. Source
What everyone fails to say is that...
Since 1970 the budget for black education was raised by about 30% per year every year. More than any other government department.
In the period 1955 -1984 the amount of black school students increased 31 times from 35,000 to 1,096 000.
65% of black South African children were at school compared to Egypt 64%, Nigeria 57%, Ghana52%, Tanzania50% and Ethiopia 29%.
Amongst the adults of South Africa, 71% could read and write (80% between the ages 12 and 22). Compare this to Kenya 47%, Egypt 38%, Nigeria 34% and Mozambique at 26%.
In South Africa, the whites built 15 new classrooms for blacks every working day, every year. At 40 children per class it meant space for an additional 600 black students every day!!!
In 1985 there were 42,000 Blacks at 5 universities in South Africa, about the same amount at the universities of the homelands.
Another example of “Bantu Education is the unique medical university of MEDUNSA that I mentioned in Part 5 of this series. Here the whites trained black medical doctors, dentists, veterinary surgeons and paramedical personnel to world class standards...at full state costs. About 200 black medical doctors were
qualified here every year...thanks to the “oppressive” Bantu Education system.
Source: (Verrat an Südafrika, 1987, Klaus Vaque).
In my search to find the true reasons for the 1976 Soweto School riots, I found that most sources say that the riots was because of AFRIKAANS being forced to be taken as the medium of instruction. Why this vilification of Afrikaans?
The truth is that if one looks at the original decree one will see that both English and Afrikaans would be used on a 50-50 basis. Once again we see how Afrikaans has been vilified over the years. I can still understand to a degree why the blacks would object to Afrikaans or English, but what I cannot understand is why the coloureds of Cape Town, who only spoke Afrikaans or English, would also boycott and riot.
Here is the original decree...
Northern Transvaal Region
"Regional Circular Bantu Education"
Northern Transvaal (No. 4)
File 6.8.3. of 17.10.1974
To: Circuit Inspectors
Principals of Schools: With Std V classes and Secondary Schools
Medium of Instruction Std V - Form V
1. It has been decided that for the sake of uniformity English and Afrikaans will be used as media of instruction in our schools on a 50-50 basis as follows:
2. Std V, Form I and II
2.1. English medium: General Science, Practical Subjects (Homecraft-Needlework-Wood- and Metalwork-Art-Agricultural Science)
2.2 Afrikaans medium: Mathematics, Arithmatic, Social Studies
2.3 Mother Tongue: Religion Instruction, Music, Physical Culture
The prescribed medium for these subject must be used as from January 1975.
In 1976 the secondary schools will continue using the same medium for these subjects.
3. Forms III, IV and V
All schools which have not as yet done so should introduce the 50-50 basis as from the beginning of 1975. The same medium must be used for the subjects related to those mentioned in paragraph 2 and for their alternatives. ...
Your co-operation in this matter will be appreciated.
(Sgd.) J.G. Erasmus
Regional Director of Bantu Education
N. Transvaal Region ...
Further. One has to remember that the National Party government always insisted on “Mother Tongue Education” for ALL races during the primary school period. It was official government policy.
Further note how Afrikaans and English would only be used for Mathematics, Science and technically skilled subjects. The rest would still be mother tongue.
But why would they want to introduce Afrikaans and English in these black schools to instruct subjects like mathematics, science and metalwork?
Well, the problem is that blacks simply never had any words for objects they never knew; they borrowed Afrikaans and English words to describe technical things. The word for Scissors is “Iskêra” from Afrikaans (skêr). The word for knife is “Imêsi” from the Afrikaans word (mes), etc.
Can you imagine trying to explain the replication of a DNA molecule to a black student in Xhoza? Can you imagine explaining the parts of a lathe to black students studying metalwork or woodwork? If you are going to use 90% English words, you might just as well do the entire thing in English...or Afrikaans for that matter. A lathe is a dangerous piece of equipment...people can kill themselves.
The other reason I found that blacks objected to was the maximum age of school attendance. Whites would finish school at 18 or 19.
Blacks on the other hand would be 18 years old in grade 7 or 25 years old in matric (Grd 12). They also started later at the age of 8 or 10. Then they expected the whites to just keep on paying for this. Then they cannot understand why less money was spent on them than on whites every year. Not only were they 5 times more than whites, they flunked so much that they spent an average of an extra five years at school.
The irony of it all is that the Indian journalist Prega Govender wrote an article in the Sunday Times of 22 October 2006, telling how black students at school were taking English as their first language at school, dropping their own mother tongue as second language and replacing it with Afrikaans, which they found easier. These students either dropped their own mother tongue completely or relegated it to “Third Language status”
Prega Govender, Easy-Afrikaans-chosen-over-African-languages
Now I ask you, “What were all those riots in 1976 for?”
The whites of South Africa made a big mistake. They should never have introduced “Bantu Education” to the blacks. They should never have taught the blacks anything. It was not their responsibility to educate blacks. If blacks are so good, then they should educate their own people. They should build their own schools, universities, and colleges with their own money, their own initiatives and their own know-how. They should go for it...I wish them nothing, but luck.
For our efforts to educate the blacks out of stone age and into the modern era, we were vilified and stoned, even killed by. We were cursed at, spat at and blamed for everything else.
The alternative we see today is the socialist “Outcomes Based Education and Traning” system, where “nobody fails”, “Everyone passes”...”Pass one;Pass all” is the ridiculous slogans and demands nowadays. Little black boy in a group with whites and coloureds dragging their marks down and raising his own merely through his presence...but hey... they all pass, right? What is the problem?
The school system is a timebomb...Four Natal schools with 0% matric pass rate
“Liberation before education” was the slogan during the Eighties. Have the communists succeeded in their goal? Have they dumbed down the blacks and most whites? A few pockets of free thinkers remained who are today blowing the horns.
People are waking up from their liberal and socialist sleep. The ANC keeps singing their lullaby, but everywhere the horns are blowing and more and more people are waking up...The ANC knows their days are numbered. Bantu Education made them clever enough to realise that...
.../to be continued
No comments:
Post a Comment